Cloth hats: (W)Hat’s the issue

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this discussion paper is to consider three issues regarding perioperative attire:

1. whether cloth hats or disposable hats are better for reducing patient risk of acquiring a surgical site infection (SSI)
2. whether the risk of infection is different for the bouffant style of hat compared to the skullcap style of hat
3. whether there is enough evidence available to support a statement that cloth hats are safe to wear in the operating suite.

Background: Hats have been routinely worn in operating suites since the 1950s. The intention of covering the hair has been to reduce the risk of the patient developing an SSI from bacteria that may be shed from the hair and skin of health care workers.

Discussion: A literature search was conducted yielding limited results (five), primarily controlled trials and case studies. Studies obtained from the literature did not conclusively prove that cloth hats posed an increased risk to patients. However, the literature cites risks to staff when non-hospital laundering has occurred. There was also no evidence-based research suggesting that the incidence of SSIs was influenced by either bouffant or skullcap style hats.

Conclusion: Ultimately, there is not enough research available to indisputably state whether disposable hats or cloth hats pose a greater risk of our patients developing a surgical site infection due to contamination from health care workers. The facility should decide whether they will ban cloth hats, based on the evidence or standards of best practice that are available, or whether they will set up appropriate hospital laundering for staff member’s scrub attire. The evidence indicates that the risk from contaminated cloth hats is not a risk to patients but to health care workers and their cohabitants through home laundering of contaminated attire.