Comparison of the effect of surgical site skin preparation with povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on the microbial load and surgical site infection in laparotomy patients: A randomised controlled trial

Diba Dashtizadeh; Fardin Amiri; Sedigheh Hannani; Mojgan Oshaghi; Nemamali Azadi

doi:10.26550/2209-1092.1358

Authors

Diba Dashtizadeh Iran University of Medical Sciences
Dr Fardin Amiri Iran University of Medical Sciences
Sedigheh Hannani Iran University of Medical Sciences
Dr Mojgan Oshaghi Iran University of Medical Sciences
Dr Nemamali Azadi Iran University of Medical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1358

Keywords:

skin preparation, povidone-iodine, temperature, microbial load, surgical site infection

Abstract

Background: Surgical site skin preparation is essential for reducing the skin’s microbial load and preventing surgical site infection (SSI). Considering the importance of determining the effect of temperature on the antimicrobial property of povidone-iodine antiseptic, this study investigated the effect of povidone-iodine antiseptic at two different temperatures on microbial load and incidence of SSI in laparotomy patients.

Method: This study was a single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial conducted from April to July 2024 at two selected hospitals in Tehran (registration number: IRCT20240212060966N1). Laparotomy patients (N = 126) were randomly assigned to the control group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 22°C) and the intervention group (secondary preparation with 10% povidone-iodine at 35°C). The skin preparation was
done in two stages (primary and secondary preparation). Both groups received the same primary preparation (7.5% povidone-iodine). Culture samples were collected before skin preparation, after the primary preparation and after the secondary preparation. A researcher-made checklist was also used to investigate the incidence of SSIs within 24 hours and 30 days after surgery. The data was analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results: The microbial load after secondary skin preparation was significantly reduced in both the control (p = 0.001) and intervention (p=0.003) groups. However, there was no significant difference in microbial load before and after secondary skin preparation between the two groups (p = 0.437). The difference in SSI incidence between the two groups was not significant
(p = 0.164).

Conclusion: Since there were no significant differences in microbial load and SSI between the two groups, it is recommended that povidone-iodine be used at room temperature for skin preparation.